Entitlement

It has been awhile since I have posted here, not because I don't have plenty to say or have plenty of items that should be passed on, but rather because I am so busy working that I don't have the time to spend here as I would like. You see, I work 4 different jobs in order to stay afloat and keep my bills paid. That's right, 4 different jobs! I'm sure I could find an excuse to wrangle myself onto welfare, or maybe some other form of government dole-out program if I was, as so many feel that they are in this country, ENTITLED! Well, I see it differently. I see entitlement as a word that only applies to say someone who was so seriously injured that it is impossible for them to work again, or someone who lost their spouse and was left with multiple children to care for and do not have the ability or resources to accomplish this task. These are the reasons such programs as Welfare were established, not to take care of some lazy sit on their ass good for nothing, lookin for a handout, you owe me, boil on the butt of society types....and while we are on the subject of boils on the butt of society, lets turn our eyes to the White House where the biggest boil and it's companion boil reside and who have convinced so many of you that you ARE ENTITLED to what someone else has.......WRONG, WRONG, WRONG!!
Let me make something very clear....I am close to 6 decades old, I have back problems, knee problems, arthritis problems as well as countless other issues to deal with. I do not have a good education and spent my entire life being self employed. When the events of the bottom dropping out of real estate hit this country, I was in a bad position and was basically wiped out. I had been smart enough to save and prepare for bad times and used those resources to keep things going until I found work. It took me over two years to find someone who was willing to put an old uneducated fool to work for $11 an hour. I took the job and because of that job I was offered another job with the willingness to work around my first job. I then found another position working for a company on commission and finally after the first job I was doing was taken over by another company, whom I continue to work for, I was offered a great position back with the first company I had been working for. All these jobs were minimal pay and the commission job was one that took a long time to get clients to commit, but guess what....a client did commit, and the other low paying jobs combined have kept the bills paid and has now led me into a better paying job. This was not because I sat on my big fat butt whining about having no money, or having to go back to work, or that someone should be taking care of me because I am old....this was because I have never felt that anyone owed me anything and therefore I don't take handouts! For those out there who feel they are entitled let me just say this....The world does NOT OWE YOU ANYTHING! If you feel it does, then pack your bags and move to Europe or somewhere that puts people like you on the public dole, let them have you cause we don't want you!! What I have, I have earned and it does not belong to you or anyone else other than my children and my grandchildren when the time comes for me to leave this world. Drag your lazy good for nothing butt out from behind the TV and get out and find a job! They're out there, they may not pay all that well and you may have to have more than one, but at least your working and will have taken the burden of one more person off the backs of the taxpayers. Maybe you should contact the White House and see if your Muslim president and his America hating wife would be willing to take you in and let you live with them until you decide your are ready to do something on your own. It seems he was all about yapping his gums and giving you free rent, gas, cars and money according to what I heard so many of you chanting after you put him in office. How's that working for you now?????? That's what I thought! I tell you what...when you get a job and you get your first paycheck and you have paid all the necessary bills you owe, then if there is anything left over, you will be entitled to spend it anyway you want! That's entitlement and it is the only entitlement anyone should be granted...PERIOD!!

The Forgotten Man - Jon McNaughton

I have nothing further to add........

“Clear case of economic terrorism”

This will chill you to the bone!!

We Will Not Obey

When you listen to what the government did to the people in Louisiana when Hurricane Katrina hit, I hope it will help to open your eyes to what our government has become. Any one of the law enforcement or military personnel who obeyed the orders given to subject these people to imprisonment, confiscation or arrest should be dealt with in a court of law, be relieved of duty and be punished for their roll in this conspiracy. Every government official who authorized this should be immediately removed from office, incarcerated and tried for treason against the American citizens. This is an outrage and to those who have elected to stand up and say "We Will Not Obey" I am with you and will stand with you against the tyranny of those who believe they are above the law and can implement whatever, whenever they want. This is America, not Nazi Germany!!

Rep Don Young Urges Producing American Energy & Opening ANWR

Very well said....he really drives home the point of why we need to stop depending on any other country for our oil. Drill baby...DRILL!!

I Hope You Are All Paying Attention

Sorry folks, it has been a couple of months since I posted here. I have been overly busy and have not had time to stay up on this blog as I should. That does not mean however that I am not paying attention and following the trends we are experiencing in America. A couple of posts back I gave you a link to an article about food pricing and I hope you read it and are paying close attention to what is happening. I am watching prices go up and up on most everything. Flour just jumped over $2.00 for 25 lbs, sugar is up, rice is really up, coffee is racing upward along with everything else. Of course, gasoline is a big part of price increases....as fuel is increasing, so are prices on the shelves.

Because our illustrious leader is hellbent on sending our fuel prices through the roof and has been keeping the drilling here in America at a standstill, we are now once again seeing an economy that was showing a small glimmer of hope make a complete U-turn and is headed back into the toilet again. It will stalemate any chance of things getting better because everyone will be spending their extra dollars on gasoline to be able to get to work and take care of their daily tasks. Yet it is a fact that the oil reserves under American soil are greater than all other nations combined and that is a hard cold fact!!

President OScrewU believes that everyone, except himself and his power hungry cronies, should cough up money to purchase a new fuel efficient vehicle that is wasting valuable resources (food) and costing more to operate than any gasoline vehicle on the road today. Regardless for most people, they either can't afford they high price tag or can't get a loan for because the hard times have destroyed their credit scores. Of course OScrewU would be just as happy that you take the bus or ride a bike to accomplish your everyday goals. Now as for OScrewU and his band of merry pillagers, they don't have to follow the rules they set down for us peasants. They don't even have to be on the mandated health care plan they have implemented, they don't have to worry about fuel efficient vehicles, they don't have to worry about where the next dollar will come from to get them from one day to the next because they are taking whatever they need from the American taxpayer and telling each and every one of us to go straight to hell if we don't like it.

I posted back in August of last year percentages that other countries are being taxed, I hope you all read it. 61% to 83% in total taxes, the results of socialistic government taking everything you earn and giving you nothing in return. Frankly, I am not interested in working for the government, giving them everything I have and allowing them to dictate to me what I can and cannot do.

OScrewU introduced a bill that you were told about in the last post I entered here on the blog back in December called S-510 FDA Food Safety Modernization Act. On Sunday, December 19, the text of S. 510 replaced the original text of H.R. 2751, and the bill passed by voice vote. H.R. 2751, originally the Consumer Assistance to Recycle and Save Act, passed the House in June 2009 and was a "vehicle" for the passage of S. 510 in a House-originating bill because S. 510 was a revenue-raising bill. All revenue-raising bills must originate in the House.
Here's how it went down:
Passed House Jun 9, 2009
Passed Senate Dec 19, 2010
Signed by President Jan 4, 2011
This bill became law. It was signed by Barack (I'm a jackass) Obama and became Public Law No: 111-353. Just so you understand my irritation here, this is the genuinely a vehicle the government can use to stop people from even growing their own food in their own gardens in their own friggen backyards!

Big Government always wants to get bigger. It always wants more power. More authority. More funding. More excuses to function as a dictatorship that rules over the American people.

Utah state Rep. Bill Wright is proposing H.B.249 a bill that would exempt his state from federal food regulations, including the recently enacted food safety bill, S-510, if the food is not sold across state lines. Within the state, it is state's rights, and Utah already has regulations over those items. Wright's bill is modeled after a Montana gun law that Utah adopted last year, which "built on the premise that if the product doesn't cross state borders, the federal government's authority to regulate interstate commerce shouldn't apply and there is no constitutional right to federal regulation."

Here is the bill as it is proposed, the rest of the nation had better wake up and see this for what it is Second Substitute H.B. 249
Representative Bill Wright proposes the following substitute bill:
1 GROWING OF FOOD
2 2011 GENERAL SESSION
3 STATE OF UTAH
4 Chief Sponsor: Christopher N. Herrod
5 Senate Sponsor: Stephen H. Urquhart
6
7 LONG TITLE
8 General Description:
9 This bill recognizes the right of an individual to grow food for personal use of the
10 individual and the individuals family, without being subject to local, state, or federal 11 regulation.
12 Highlighted Provisions:
13 This bill:
14 recognizes the right of an individual to grow food for personal use of the individual
15 and the individuals family, on the individuals property, without being subject to
16 local, state, or federal regulation; and
17 unless the food poses a risk to health, a risk of spreading insect infestation, a risk of
18 spreading agricultural disease, or is unlawfully possessed, prohibits governmental 19 confiscation of food grown for individual or family use, or food stored in an
20 individuals dwelling.
21 Money Appropriated in this Bill:
22 None
23 Other Special Clauses:
24 None
25 Utah Code Sections Affected:
26 ENACTS:
27 4-1-9, Utah Code Annotated 1953
28
29 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
30 Section 1. Section 4-1-9 is enacted to read:
31 4-1-9. Growing food for personal use.
32 (1) The state recognizes the right of an individual, without federal intervention, to grow
33 food for personal use by the individual or a member of the individuals family, on the
34 individuals property, without being subject to local, state, or federal laws, ordinances, or rules,
35 if the food:
36 (a) is legal for human consumption;
37 (b) is lawfully possessed;
38 (c) does not pose a health risk;
39 (d) does not negatively impact the rights of adjoining property owners; and
40 (e) complies with the food safety requirements of this title.
41 (2) A government entity may not confiscate food grown in accordance with this 42 section, or food stored in an individuals home or dwelling, that is legal for human consumption
43 and is lawfully possessed, unless the food poses a risk:
44 (a) to health;
45 (b) of spreading insect infestation; or
46 (c) of spreading agricultural disease.Legislative Review Note as of 3-3-11 6:10 PMAs required by legislative rules and practice, the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel provides the following legislative review note to assist the Legislature in making its own determination as to the constitutionality of the bill. The note is based on an analysis of relevant state and federal constitutional law as applied to the bill. The note is not written for the purpose of influencing whether the bill should become law, but is written to provide information relevant to the legislators' consideration of this bill. The note is not a substitute for the judgment of the judiciary, which has authority to determine the constitutionality of a law in the context of a specific case.
This legislation recognizes the right of an individual to grow and store food for the personal
use of the individual and the individuals family without being subject to local, state, or federal laws, ordinances, or rules. Furthermore, it provides that a government entity, not excluding Federal government entity, may confiscate that food only under certain circumstances. Even if this legislation is interpreted to be limited to wholly intrastate conduct, the United States Supreme Court has held that the United States Congress has broad power to regulate purely intrastate activity under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. Gonzales v.Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 18 (2005) (“Congress can regulate purely intrastate activity . . . if it concludes that failure to regulate that class of activity would undercut the regulation of the interstate market in that commodity.”); U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 3. Moreover, even if the growing and storing of food described in this bill is not considered commercial activity, the Supreme Court has held that Congress may regulate intrastate activity if it substantially affects interstate commerce. United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549, 559 (1995). Indeed, the regulation of agricultural commodities is a fundamental example of what Congress may regulate under the Commerce Clause. Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111, 125 (1942) (holding that Congress may regulate wholly intrastate conduct_even the growing of wheat for consumption only by the grower_if “it exerts a substantial economic effect on interstate commerce.”). Furthermore, the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution declares the laws of the United States to be the supreme law of the land. U.S. Const. art. VI, cl. 2. The Supreme Court has interpreted this to mean, for example, that a federal regulation properly adopted under federal law preempts state law that conflicts with the federal regulation. Fry v. United States,421 U.S. 542, 547-48 (1975). Based on this authority, there is a high probability that a court would find that this legislation unconstitutional in that it violates the Supremacy Clause by limiting the permissible exercise of Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause.

....Once Government controls the food, they control the people, plain and simple. Hitler took control of all food sources, once he accomplished this, the rest was easy. Sleep on that tonight!

S 510 - The "Food Control" Bill passed to move forward 69-26 NOV 29, 2010

Please, listen to this, pass it on, contact your Senators, call the White House (202) 221-3121, this has to be stopped and it is up to us to get it done! This is the final nail in our coffin, government controls the food, we starve, they win. Please be aware of how dangerous this bill is!

We Are Headed For A Catastrophe!

Please listen to this, please be prepared, please don't take a chance that this is wrong, please be prepared.

Food Price Projections

Good morning all. Below is a special report I received from NIA about U.S. food price projections. I highly suggest you take the time to read this report, it's not long, but it is something that everyone needs to see. We are headed for massive food price increases and it would do everyone well to become as prepared as possible for this future upheaval. Just an example I personally have seen in the past 3 months. Butter at Costco has gone from $6.66 for a 4 box of 4 cubes pack to $10.79 in just 3 months!! Coffee has also skyrocketed and customers who are looking to by coffee are commenting on how expensive it is getting. This is just the tip of the iceberg folks! The government has created massive problems over the past two years and Americans are going to feel some disastrous effects from the power grabbing, greedy, socialistic idiot who occupies the oval office and his socialist lackeys. Please, read this!!

NIA's special U.S. food price projection report is now available to download for free at: http://inflation.us/foodpriceprojections.pdf

If you would like your family members, friends, and co-workers to receive this special report, please tell them to become a member of NIA for free today at http://inflation.us

Happy Days Are Here Again!!

This was allot of fun to watch! I need a job like the where I can laugh all day long!!

End Of Liberty

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQv-sdMCClQ

You all better damn well watch this, the movement to change the political landscape of this country is not going to be enough, our totally corrupt system of government in this country must fall, it is time to take the words of Abraham Lincoln to heart: "This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it or their revolutionary right to dismember it or overthrow it."

-- Abraham Lincoln, 4 April 1861

OUR NEW DICTATOR MAY BE IN DEEP TROUBLE

Our Dictator May Be In Deep Trouble.
by Kimberly Baehr on Thursday, October 21, 2010 at 6:27pm.

Chief Justice John Roberts, Supreme Court.

According to sources who watch the inner workings of the Federal Government, a

Smackdown of Barack Obama by the U.S. Supreme Court may be inevitable.

http://aquidneckinquirer.typepad.com/aquidneck_inquirer/2010/06/coming-later-this-week-in-the-aquidneck-inqurier-in-the-preston-political-primer-the-real-showdown-t.html

Since Obama assumed the office of President, critics have hammered him on a number

of Constitutional issues. Critics have complained that much, if not all of Obama's major initiatives run headlong into Constitutional roadblocks on the power of the Federal Government.

Obama certainly did not help himself in the eyes of the Court when he used the venue

of the State of the Union address early in the year to publicly flog the Court over its

ruling that the First Amendment grants the right to various organizations to run

political ads during the time of an election.

The tongue-lashing clearly did not sit well with the Court, as demonstrated by Justice

Sam Alito, who publicly shook his head and stated under his breath, 'That's not true,'

(view video:) http://www.debbieschlussel.com/16177/justice-alitos-not-true-best-video-moment-in-yawnworthy-obama-sotu-speech/ when Obama told a flat-out LIE

concerning the Court's ruling.

As it has turned out, this was a watershed moment in the relationship between the

Executive and the Judicial Branches of the Federal Government. Obama publicly

declared war on the court, http://www.cbsnews.com/8618-215_162-6307203.html?assetTypeId=30&messageId=9161583 even as he blatantly continued to propose

legislation that flies in the face of every known Constitutional principle upon which

this nation has stood for over 200 years. Obama has even identified Chief Justice

John Roberts as his Number One Enemy, that is, apart from Fox News and Rush

Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, and so on.

And it is no accident that the one swing-vote on the court, Justice Anthony Kennedy,

stated recently that he has no intention of retiring until 'Obama is gone.'
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2010/07/06/2010-07-06_holdin_court_at_73_justice_kennedy_tells_pals_hes_not_retiring_for_years__thats_.html

Apparently, the Court has had enough. The Roberts Court has signaled, in a very subtle

manner, of course, that it intends to address the issues about which Obama critics have

been screaming to high heaven. A ruling against Obama on any one of these important

issues could potentially cripple the Administration. Such a thing would be long overdue.

1st -- There is ObamaCare, which violates the Constitutional principle barring the

Federal Government from forcing citizens to purchase something. And no, this is not

the same thing as states requiring drivers to purchase car insurance, as some of the

intellectually-impaired claim. The Constitution LIMITS FEDERAL Government, not

State Governments, from such things, and further, not everyone has to drive, and thus,

a citizen could opt not to purchase car insurance by simply deciding not to drive a

vehicle. In the ObamaCare world, however, NO citizen can 'OPT OUT.'

2nd -- Sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama's history that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the

office of President. The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. This information involves possible fraudulent use of aSocial Security number in Connecticut , while Obama

was a high school student in Hawaii. And that is only the tip of the iceberg.

3rd -- Several cases involving possible criminal activity, conflicts of interest, and

pay-for-play cronyism could potentially land many Administration officials, if not Obama himself, in hot water with the Court. Frankly, in the years this writer has observed politics, nothing comes close to comparing with the rampant corruption of this Administration,

not even during the Nixon years. Nixon and the Watergate conspirators look like choirboys compared to the jokers that populate this Administration.

In addition, the Court will eventually be forced to rule on the dreadful decision of the

Obama Department Of Justice suing the state of Arizona. That, too, could send the

Obama doctrine of open borders to an early grave, given that the Administration refuses

to enforce federal law on illegal aliens.

Finally, the BIGGIE that could potentially send the entire house of cards tumbling in a

free-fall is the latest revelation concerning the Obama-Holder Department of Justice

and its refusal to pursue the New Black Panther Party. The group was caught on tape COMMITTING FELONIES by attempting to intimidate Caucasian voters into staying

away from the polls. http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_070110/content/01125112.guest.html

A whistle-blower who resigned from the Department Of Justice is now charging Holder

with the deliberate refusal to pursue cases against Blacks, particularly those who are

involved in radical hate-groups, such as the New Black Panthers, who have been caught

on tape calling for the murder of white people and their babies. http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/42683/

This one is a biggie that could send the entire Administration crumbling--that is, if the Justices have the guts to draw a line in the sand at the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Original article: http://www.resistnet.com/forum/topics/
smackdown-of-barack-obama-by?xg_source=activity

I pray that the judicial system will press forward taking proper action against this imposter who is working feverishly to dismantle our entire nation!

Republican Challenger Casts Pelosi as 'Wicked Witch' of Washington

From Fox News -- John Dennis's latest campaign video. Dennis has a full cast of "Wizard of Oz" characters, including a scarecrow, lion and tin man who lament political parties without heart, courage or brains. "Dorothy" says she's just concerned about debt.

Along comes the wicked witch with the Pelosi haircut who says she'll save the lost troupe as long as it pays for Wall Street bailouts and her high-price downtown office building. Dennis then shows up with a bucket of "freedom" that he splashes on the witch, and introduces himself as the character to "throw a little water on politicians who say one thing and do another, like Nancy Pelosi."

Dennis hits up former Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson as the wizard who made the mess and takes a parting shot at campaign finance reform supported by Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Russ Feingold, D-Wis.

This is great....watch.....


Thanks MG

Can't Add a Thing ....... This Says it All!!

Food For Thought.....‏

Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton

Once in a while, a cartoon comes around that
absolutely hits the nail on the head.

Steve Wynn

Steve Wynn, a casino resort/real-estate developer who has been credited with spearheading the dramatic resurgence and expansion of the Las Vegas Strip, talks about the Fall of America.

Samuel Adams

“The liberties of our country, the freedom of our civil Constitution, are worth defending at all hazards; and it is our duty to defend them against all attacks. We have received them as a fair inheritance from our worthy ancestors: they purchased them for us with toil and danger and expense of treasure and blood, and transmitted them to us with care and diligence. It will bring an everlasting mark of infamy on the present generation, enlightened as it is, if we should suffer them to be wrested from us by violence without a struggle, or to be cheated out of them by the artifices of false and designing men.” -- Samuel Adams

Quote:

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."
Abraham Lincoln

The New Presidential Symbol

Be it hear by known that the skunk has now replaced the Eagle as the new symbol for the current President sitting in the White house. It is half black, half white, and everything it does stinks.

A Look Back To Day One.......

Obama's first executive order strikes a blow for transparency and the rule of law, Watch......

The Great Reneger

MG sent this to me this morning. Pretty well sums it up!

"I Fought For You"

If you watch or do nothing else on this Labor Day, I recommend that you watch this short video. For God and Country! Those who fight to protect us now and for those who have fought to protect us in the past I salute you!

Obama Has New Scheme Cooking With EPA

So, the Obama Administration is at it again, this time considering using the power of the federal government to ban the sale of certain types of ammunition. This ban would increase cost for hunters and fisherman dramatically if implemented, and would go against the will of the American people....gee, there's a big surprise! Obama not following the will of the people! This is a totally inappropriate use of federal power, once again!

U.S. News and World Report posted a story today indicating that President Obama’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is considering a ban on lead bullets and sinkers in the name of "protecting the environment". Oh yeah, that's exactly what it is all about folks! This ban, if put into place, would dramatically increase the cost of ammunition for hunters and lead sinkers for anglers. If gun owners needed any more evidence that the Obama Administration is looking for creative ways to take away the Second Amendment rights of all Americans, they need to look no further than this new proposed rule.

This is an idea that would have absolutely no chance of passing in Congress, yet liberals in the Obama Administration clearly are looking for ways to implement a creative means to raise the prices of ammunition and infringe on hunter’s rights. The American people reject gun control, yet Obama and the EPA does not care about the will of the American people. Remember, this is the same Administration that nominated two anti-Second Amendment lawyers to the Supreme Court, Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.

The NRA is already on full alert and has already gone to their battle stations to fight this new scheme cooked up by the man who wants to be king and his EPA cronies!

Special army unit ready to be deployed on American soil just before November elections

Anthony G. Martin
Conservative Examiner Note: An update has been posted at the end of the article.

In October of this year, one month prior to the November midterm elections, a special army unit known as 'Consequence Management Response Force' will be ready for deployment on American soil if so ordered by the President.

The special force, which is the new name being given to the 1st Brigade Combat Team of the 3rd Infantry, has been training at Fort Stewart, Georgia and is composed of 80,000 troops.

According to the Army Times,

They may be called upon to help with civil unrest and crowd control or to deal with potentially horrific scenarios such as massive poisoning and chaos in response to a chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear or high-yield explosive, or CBRNE, attack.

The key phrase is 'may be called upon to help with civil unrest.'

This afternoon a local radio talk show host reported that he had been in contact with a member of the military. This military source stated that the armed forces have been alerted to the strong possibility that civil unrest may occur in the United States this summer, prior to the midterm elections of 2010.

The source described this as 'our long, hot summer of discontent' that could be eerily reminiscent of the summer of 1968 when riots broke out in many of our largest cities.

However, the summer of 2010 could well be much worse due to the players involved. In 1968 the major players were war protesters. This time, the outrage simmering beneath the surface of American society involves a broad cross-section of the heartland, and most of them are heavily armed.

It is highly unlikely that these citizens would ever initiate armed conflict of any kind. In their view, gun rights are for self-defense--and for defense against tyrannical government, which our Founders regarded as the most dangerous force on earth.

However, it has become clear that other groups may well initiate violence in order to start an 'incident' that would give Obama and a rogue Congress a reason to implement martial law, confiscate the citizens' guns, enforce curfews, and suspend all future elections until such time as it is deemed 'safe' to proceed with human liberty as encapsulated in the right to vote.

Tea Party members, for example, have been warned in recent days that members of Andy Stern's SEIU union and members of the organization formerly known as ACORN plan to infiltrate Tea Party gatherings in order to incite some sort of incident that could result in armed conflict.

In addition, all indications point to a humiliating defeat for the Democrats and Obama in November. Not only will the House in all likelihood transfer to Republican control, but it is increasingly possible for the Democrats to lose the Senate as well.

And there are Leftwing groups in this country that would use whatever means necessary to prevent that from happening.

ACORN has already gone underground, changing its name so as to fly beneath the radar screen. How many people will the group register to vote illegally? And with Obama's plan to naturalize between 10 and 20 million illegal aliens, a brand new voter base for the Democrats will be in place prior to November.

Add to this the growing unrest over continued high unemployment, the coming spike in interest rates and inflation, and the still-boiling outrage over the manner in which Obama and the Democrats shoved ObamaCare down the throats of the citizens, and all of the ingredients are present for a major F-5 tornado to sweep across the heartland.

To what extent would soldiers use deadly force during such 'civil unrest' should the Consequence Management Response Team be utilized? During the anti-war riots of the 1960s they killed student protesters. What about now?

The military source cited by the radio host today was asked this very question. He would merely say that the culture of the U.S. military is changing--half support Obama and the other half are dead-set against him. His conclusion? There is no way to know for sure if they would obey an order to open fire on ordinary citizens.

Update: The Cato Institute published this warning when the program was launched in its first phase in 2008 (the program has been updated and expanded since 2008). The Founders insisted that standing armies were never to be used against American citizens on our own soil, no matter what violations of this principle have occurred in the years following. In the spirit of the Patriots and of real journalists government must be questioned constantly and held to intense scrutiny in order to preserve liberty.

Obama, evidence of Treason! Fall of the Republic!

Pay close attention to this, very close attention.....

I Want Your Money Trailer (2010) HD

Excellent!!! Excellent!!! The movie will be awesome!!!
The BS meter is a nice touch!!

Important Message from the White House on Racism

This may be funny, but in reality is pretty darn close to what is going on!!