Wake Up America: 2009

Thursday, December 31, 2009

Executive Order Amended to Immunize INTERPOL In America - Is The ICC Next?

Executive Order Amended to Immunize INTERPOL In America - Is The ICC Next?
By Steve Schippert, Clyde Middleton

Last Thursday, December 17, 2009, The White House released an Executive Order "Amending Executive Order 12425." It grants INTERPOL (International Criminal Police Organization) a new level of full diplomatic immunity afforded to foreign embassies and select o the r "International Organizations" as set forth in the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945.

By removing language from President Reagan's 1983 Executive Order 12425, this international law enforcement body now operates - now operates - on American soil beyond the reach of our own top law enforcement arm, the FBI, and is immune from Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) requests.

For Immediate Release December 17, 2009
Executive Order -- Amending Executive Order 12425

EXECUTIVE ORDER
- - - - - - -
AMENDING EXECUTIVE ORDER 12425 DESIGNATING INTERPOL
AS A PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION ENTITLED TO
ENJOY CERTAIN PRIVILEGES, EXEMPTIONS, AND IMMUNITIES

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order to extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 12425 of June 16, 1983, as amended, is fur the r amended by deleting from the first sentence the words "except those provided by Section 2©, Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act" and the semicolon that immediately precedes the m.

BARACK OBAMA

THE WHITE HOUSE,

December 16, 2009.

After initial review and discussions between the writers of this analysis, the context was spelled out plainly.

Through EO 12425, President Reagan extended to INTERPOL recognition as an "International Organization." In short, the privileges and immunities afforded foreign diplomats was extended to INTERPOL. Two sets of important privileges and immunities were withheld: Section 2© and the remaining sections cited (all of which deal with differing taxes).

And the n comes December 17, 2009, and President Obama. The exemptions in EO 12425 were removed.

Section 2c of the United States International Organizations Immunities Act is the crucial piece.

Property and assets of international organizations, wherever located and by whomsoever held, shall be immune from search, unless such immunity be expressly waived, and from confiscation. The archives of international organizations shall be inviolable. (Emphasis added.)

Inviolable archives means INTERPOL records are beyond US citizens' Freedom of Information Act requests and from American legal or investigative discovery ("unless such immunity be expressly waived.")

Property and assets being immune from search and confiscation means precisely that. Wherever the y may be in the United States . This could conceivably include human assets - Americans arrested on our soil by INTERPOL officers.

Context: International Criminal Court

The importance of this last crucial point cannot be understated, because this immunity and protection - and elevation above the US Constitution - afforded INTERPOL is likely a precursor to the White House subjecting the United States under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC). INTERPOL provides a significant enforcement function for the ICC, just as our FBI provides a significant function for our Department of Justice.

We direct the American public to paragraph 28 of the ICC's Proposed Programme Budget for 2010 (PDF).

29. Additionally, the Court will continue to seek the cooperation of States not party to the Rome Statute and to develop its relationships with regional organizations such as the Organization of American States (OAS), the Arab League (AL), the African Union (AU), the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), ASEAN and CARICOM. We will also continue to engage with subregional and the matic organizations, such as SADC and ECOWAS, and the Commonwealth Secretariat and the OIF. This will be done through high level visits, briefings and, as appropriate, relationship agreements. Work will also be carried out with sectoral organizations such as IDLO and INTERPOL, to increase efficiency.

The United States is not a party to the Rome Statute - the UN treaty that established the International Criminal Court. (See: Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court)

President George W. Bush rejected subjecting the United States to the jurisdiction of the ICC and removed the United States as a signatory. President Bill Clinton had previously signed the Rome Statute during his presidency. Two critical matters are at play. One is an overall matter of sovereignty and the concept of the primacy of American law above those of the rest of the world. But more recently a more over-riding concern principally has been the potential - if not likely - specter of subjecting our Armed Forces to a hostile international body seeking war crimes prosecutions during the execution of an unpopular war.

President Bush in fact went so far as to gain agreement from nations that the y would expressly not detain or hand over to the ICC members of the United States armed forces. The fear of a symbolic ICC circus trial as a form of international political protest to American military actions in Iraq and elsewhere was real and palpable.

President Obama's words have been carefully chosen when directly regarding the ICC. While President Bush outright rejected subjugating American armed forces to any international court as a matter of policy, President Obama said in his 2008 presidential campaign that it is merely "premature to commit" to signing America on.

However, in a Foreign Policy in Focus round-table in 2008, the host group cited his former foreign policy advisor, Samantha Power. She essentially laid down what can be viewed as now-President Obama's roadmap to America rejoining the ICC. His principal objections are not explained as those of sovereignty, but ra the r of image and perception.

Obama's former foreign policy advisor, Samantha Power, said in an early March (2008) interview with The Irish Times that many things need to happen before Obama could think about signing the Rome Treaty.

"Until we've closed Guantánamo, gotten out of Iraq responsibly, renounced torture and rendition, shown a different face for America , American membership of the ICC is going to make countries around the world think the ICC is a tool of American hegemony.

The detention center at Guantánamo Bay is nearing its closure and an alternate continental American site for terrorist detention has been selected in Illinois . The time line for Iraq withdrawal has been set. And President Obama has given an abundance of international speeches intended to "show a different face for America ." He has in fact been roundly criticized domestically for the routinely apologetic and critical nature of the se speeches.

President Obama has not rejected the concept of ICC jurisdiction over US citizens and service members. He has avoided any direct reference to this while offering praise for the ICC for conducting its trials so far "in America 's interests." The door thus remains wide open to the skeptical observer.

CONCLUSIONS

In light of what we know and can observe, it is our logical conclusion that President Obama's Executive Order amending President Ronald Reagans' 1983 EO 12425 and placing INTERPOL above the United States Constitution and beyond the legal reach of our own top law enforcement is a precursor to more damaging moves.

The pre-requisite conditions regarding the Iraq withdrawal and the Guantanamo Bay terrorist detention facility closure will continue the ir course.. meanwhile, the next move from President Obama is likely an attempt to dissolve the agreements made between President Bush and o the r states preventing the m from turning over American military forces to the ICC (via INTERPOL) for war crimes or any o the r prosecutions.

When the paths on the road map converge - Iraq withdrawal, Guantánamo closure, perceived American image improved internationally, and an empowered INTERPOL in the United States - it is probable that President Barack Obama will once again make America a signatory to the International Criminal Court. It will be a move that surrenders American sovereignty to an international body who's INTERPOL enforcement arm has already been elevated above the Constitution and American domestic law enforcement.

For an added and disturbing wrinkle, INTERPOL's central operations office in the United States is within our own Justice Department offices. They are American law enforcement officers working under the aegis of INTERPOL within our own Justice Department. That the y now operate with full diplomatic immunity and with "inviolable archives" from within our own buildings should send red flags soaring into the clouds.

This is the disturbing context for President Obama's quiet release of an amended Executive Order 12425. American sovereignty hangs in the balance if the se actions are not prevented through public outcry and political pressure. Some Americans are paying attention, as can be seen from some of the earliest recognitions of this troubling development here, here and here. But the discussion must extend well beyond the Internet and social media.

Ultimately, a detailed verbal explanation is due the American public from the President of the United States detailing why an international law enforcement arm assisting a court we are not a signatory to has been elevated above our Constitution upon our soil.

By Steve Schippert on December 23, 2009 3:00 AM

After reading this, I am totally convinced that Obama is a Terrorist!!

Final Thoughts For 2009

2009 has been the worst year on record that I can remember, and I go back well over 50 years. I have not only lost most of what I had, but I also cannot get work to try and save what I have left, but I am not on the government’s doorstep looking for a handout or a free ride. I am not the only one, many people are suffering at the hands of our stupid politicians and most everyone out there has not been immune to the disastrous progressive socialist agenda that our current politicians in power are desperately shoving down our throats. Of course if you are the likes of ACORN, SEIU, AIG, Citibank, Bank of America or all the corrupt people holding offices and are associated with the likes of Obama and his Chicago style politics, such as those who adorn his administration and the Czars who are being illegally handed our country on a silver platter and who have received billions of taxpayer dollars to bail them out or rather to line their pockets, then of course you have no worries!

The healthcare bill is being muscled through by way of payoffs to politicians in order to get them to play ball with Obama, who refuses to listen to the will of the people who are screaming about his actions louder than they did Hillary care. Some of the politicians such as the likes of Senator Mary Landrieu who was against the health care bill have caved in to payoffs such as the 300 billion dollar payout Landrieu will receive for her state of Louisiana for switching her vote to support Osama’s health care bill. Our president is nothing more than a lying deceitful self proclaimed Muslim who shows us daily that he has no regard for the American people but rather his loyalties to those who are intent upon destroying us and while the press keeps his big mouth wife under wraps because she hates America and is so vocal about it, we still actually have people in this country that are so damn stupid they cannot see the obvious. Just look at what he did on December 17th 2009 signing and amending executive order 12425 to immunize INTERPOL in America. You will need to read my next post to get all the details; it is guaranteed to piss you off!!

I love this country and know that it was created under the direction of God to allow us a nation where we would be free to practice the religious beliefs that our forefathers stood for so many years ago. It is the responsibility of each and every American to stand against the evil that is trying so desperately to destroy us from within and I for one will not be deterred, I will stand for what God and my forefathers worked so diligently to create and protect. My deepest appreciation goes to those who have fought and died to protect this great country and the Constitution, but as we have all seen, Obama has no regard for the military or what they stand for.

As we approach a new year I urge everyone to become heavily involved in the process of removing these thugs from office and replacing them with people who will stand for America and the Constitution protecting them at all costs. I am tired of all the rules we are being subjected to about political correctness and minority rules. The majority of this country are religious God fearing people who have worked hard for what they have and frankly it is total BS that they are required to hand it over to some low life illegal or lazy good for nothing minority who feels that they are due a reward from others just because they happen to be alive and living in this country, and our politicians see nothing wrong with it. Doing the math I have come to the conclusion that it would have been much cheaper to round up all the low life’s in this country and ship them off to places like Iran, Iraq or Venezuela where they would get just exactly what they deserve, a place where they could live under socialistic rule having the government take total care of them and treating them like the scum they have become.

Everyone in this country has always had the opportunity to succeed, but if you were foolish enough to believe that the government was there just for you, then I say it's too damn bad you didn't succeed and it’s time for you to pack your bags and move on. We have got to stop living in fear of the government and under the current rule of tyranny that is plaguing us at this time. Wake Up America, come to your senses and stand up for what you believe. There are millions of us that are already doing just that and it is time for the rest of you to wake up and come to the party!

Is Anybody Paying Attention??

$34,000:
The amount of federal taxes that Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner (D) failed to pay during his employment at the International Monetary Fund despite receiving extra compensation and explanatory brochures that described his tax liabilities.
True: http://www.cleveland.com/nation/index.ssf/2009/01/timothy_geithner_obamas_nomine.html

$75,000:
The amount of money that the head of the powerful tax-writing committee, Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-NY), was forced to report on his taxes after the discovery that he had not reported income from a Dominican
Republic rental property. His excuses for the failure started with blaming his wife, then his accountant
and finally the fact that he didn't speak Spanish.
True: http://www.nypost.com/seven/09102008/news/regionalnews/rangels_spanish_excuse_128444.htm

$93,000:
The INCREASE in the amount of petty cash each of our Congressional representatives voted to give themselves in January 2009 during the height of an economic meltdown. That's a $40 + million INCREASE!
True: http://gatewaypundit.blogspot..com/2009/01/its-recession-congress-gives-lawmakers.html

$133,900:
The amount Fannie Mae "invested" in Chris Dodd (D-CT), head of the powerful Senate Banking Committee, presumably to repel oversight of the GSE prior to its meltdown. Said meltdown helped touch off the current economic crisis. In only a few years time, Fannie also "invested" over $105,000 in
then-Senator Barack Obama.
True: http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2008/07/top-senate-recipients-of-fanni.html

$140,000:
The amount of back taxes and interest that Cabinet nominee Tom Daschle(D) was forced to cough up after the vetting process revealed significant, unexplained tax liabilities.
True: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123335984751235247.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

$356,000:
The approximate amount of income and deductions that Dasc hle(D) was forced to report on his amended 2005 and 2007 tax returns after being caught cheating on his taxes. This includes $255,256 for the use of a car service, $83,333 in unreported income, and $14,963 in charitable contributions.
True: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123335984751235247.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

$800,000:
The amount of "sweetheart" mortgages Senate Banking Chairman Chris Dodd (D-CT) received from Countrywide Financial, the details for which he has refused to release details despite months of promises to do so. Countrywide was once the nation's largest mortgage lender and linked to Government-Sponsored Entities like Fannie Mae and Freddie Ma c. Their meltdown precipitated the current financial crisis. Just days ago in Pennsylvania, Countrywide was forced to pay $150,000,000 in mortgage assistance following "a state investigation that concluded that Countrywide relaxed its underwriting standards tosell risky loans to consumers who did not understand them and could not afford them."

$1,000,000:
The estimated amount of donations by Denise Rich, wife of fugitive Marc Rich, to Democrat interests and the William J. Clinton Foundation in an apparent quid pro quo deal that resulted in a pardon for Mr. Rich. The pardon was reviewed and blessed by Obama Attorney General and then Deputy AG Eric
Holder, despite numerous requests by government officials to turn it down.
True: http://articles.latimes.com/2008/nov/20/nation/na-holder20

$12,000,000:
The amount of TARP money provided to community bank OneUnited despite the fact that it did not qualify for funds, and was "under attack from its regulators for allegations of poor lending practices and executive-pay abuses." It turns out that Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA), a key contributor to the Fannie
Mae meltdown, just happens to be married to one of the bank's former directors.
True: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123258284337504295.html

$23,500,000:
The upper range of net worth Rep. Allan Mollohan(D-WV) accumulated in four years time according to The Washington Post through earmarks of "tens of millions of dollars to groups associated with his own business partners."
True: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/14/AR2006051401032.html

$2,000,000,000:
($2 billion) the approximate amount of money that House Appropriation s Chairman David Obey (D-WI) is earmarking related to his son's lobbying efforts. The son, Craig Obey, is "a top lobbyist for the nonprofit group" that would receive a roughly $2 billion component of the "Stimulus" package.
True: http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/a_plan_for_stimulus_money_national_parks/C530/L37/

$3,700,000,000:
($3.7 billion) not to be outdone, this is the estimated value of various defense contracts awarded to a company controlled by the husband of Rep. Diane Feinstein (D-CA). Despite an obvious conflict-of-interest as "a member of 20 the Military Construction Appropriations subcommittee, Sen. Feinstein voted for appropriations worth billions to her husband's firms?."
True: http://www.sfgatecom/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2003/04/22/MN310531.DTL http://www.bohemian.com/metro/01.24.07/dianne-feinstein-0704.html

$4,190,000,000:
($4.19 billion) the amount of money in t he so-called "Stimulus" package devoted to fraudulent voter
registration ACORN group?under the auspices of "Community Stabilization Activities". ACORN
is currently the subject of a RICO suit in Ohio .
True: http://www.ocregister.com/articles/stimulus-economy-percent-2295331-bill-pelosi

$1,646,000,000,000 ($1.646 trillion):
The approximate amount of annual; United States exports endangered by the "Stimulus" package, which provides a "Buy American" stricture. According to international trade experts, a "US-EU trade war looms": which could result in a worldwide economic depression reminiscent of that touched off by the protectionist Smoot-Hawley Act.
True: http://www.asiaing.com/2008-national-export-strategy-the-new-global-main-street.html
http://www.powerlineblogcom/archives/2009/01/022685.php
Background: Smoot-Hawley Act:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoot-Hawley_Tariff_Act

It's not just a culture of corruption; it's a culture of corruption and stupidity. In addition, these folks appear to be above the law. All of the afore mentioned are still in office, ruling like royalty they've become.

All this happened in just the FIRST QUARTER of 2009. Look at where we are now!

Government and the People

When a government founded by the people for the people enacts something that a over whelming majority of its citizens do not want then this is a government controlled by special interests or a government interested in control. The new administration promised us change, fundamental change and transparency in government. Yet they write new legislation, that everyone agrees will have a huge significant effect on America, behind closed doors. Why? Legislation that if passed into law will impact everyone of us and control a significant part of the economy. Legislation that has far reaching tentacles into all of our lives and more control than most of us even know about or realize. Why? If you wonder why like I do I suggest reading some of the bills that are being passed, there's a whole lot that concerns me and should you to!

"Whenever the people are well-informed, they can be trusted with their own government. Whenever things get so far wrong as to attract their notice, they may be relied on to set them to rights." "A government afraid of its citizens is a Democracy. Citizens afraid of government is tyranny!" - Thomas Jefferson

From His Own Mouth

Makes Perfect Sense To Me

"When the people fear their government there is tyranny;
when the government fears the people, there is liberty." Thomas Jefferson

Proposed Amendment 28
Congress shall make no law that applies to the citizens of the United
States that does not apply equally to the Senators or Representatives,
and Congress shall make no law that applies to the Senators or
Representatives that does not apply equally to the citizens of the
United States .

This Says It All

THREE DAY WORK WEEKS that we all pay for that gives them secure jobs, lifetime healthcare,
great retirement benefits and the opportunity to vote for their own pay raises, solitaire, Facebook, checking baseball scores while convened to vote on a new budget.

One Picture is Worth a Thousand Words

Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Why is Islamberg Now a Ghost Town?

Dr. Paul L. Williams, PhD
Why Is Islamberg Now a Ghost Town?
December 22, 2009

The Wall Street Journal reports this week that U.S. investigators are discovering that more and more young Muslims are vanishing from mosques, madrassas, and Islamic centers.

The disappearances, the Journal notes, are raising grave concerns among FBI and Homeland Security officials who fear that an onset of jihadist activity will take place on American soil in the near future.

Hundreds of Muslim men are also missing from Islamberg and this is not a propitious omen.

The sentry post is gone and no guards are in sight at the entrance to the 70 acre Islamic settlement located in the dense forest between Deposit and Hancock in upper New York State.

Young men in Islamic garb no longer congregate before the makeshift mosque, and no students are in attendance at the one room shack that serves as Sheikh Gilani's “International Quranic Open University.”

Gunfire no longer can be heard from the firing ranges along the eastern parameter of the property – and no grunts come from new recruits at the obstacle course.

A new sign at the entranceway reads, “Welcome to Holy Islamberg: The International Quranic Open University.” Next to this sign, which features the image of a mosque emerging from the mountains, is a pot of plastic carnations. Another sign proclaims that the community is home to the “United Muslim – Christian Forum.”

Such statements of welcome are offset by the “No Trespassing” signs that have been nailed to trees throughout the compound.

On the opposite side of the road leading into the community is a rack of metal mailboxes bearing such names as Abdul-Haqq, Abdul Jalil, Mumim Roberts, Abdullah Simonds, and Salam Insan.

What has happened to this once bustling complex of radical Islamists – a place where the cries of muezzins were accompanied by the incessant rat-tat-tat of machine gunfire? Where are the Arab dignitaries that used to visit this remote community in chauffeur-driven limousines? Where are the armed sentries who warded away all intruders?

A handful of children play in the mud and muck before rows of rusty old trailers, and a few women in full burkas walk along the rutty dirt road that leads to the heart of the squalid Muslim compound.

The few residents who remain in the settlement are not environmentalists. Sewage seeps from septic tanks and outhouses into the creek that flows at the base of the settlement. Bags of rotting garbage remain stacked between the trailers. And the once pristine countryside is now littered with junk cars, moldy mattresses, empty tanks of propane, and old appliances.

Where are the men?

What has happened to this bustling center of jihadi training?

Why has Islamberg become a ghost town?

The same phenomenon of vanishing Muslim men is taking place at mosques, madrassas, and other Islamic communities throughout the country and at other Jamaat ul-Fuqra paramilitary compounds, including one in Red House, Virginia.

U.S. investigators have now discovered that many of the missing Muslims are showing up in the killing fields of Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Somalia.

Five American Muslims recently were arrested in Pakistan following a raid at the home of a member of the Jaish-e-Muhammad, a Pakistani movement designated as a terrorist group by the U.S. Treasury Department in 2001.

The five American Muslims – identified as Ahmed Abdullah, Waqar Hassan Khan, Eman Hassan, Yasir and Rami Zamzam – were planning to join forces with the Taliban to fight the U.S.-led coalition forces in Afghanistan.

Zamzam is a graduate dental student at Howard University, where he served as president of the Muslim Student Association.

David Coleman Headley, another Muslim who disappeared, is a native of Chicago who attended Lashkar-e-Toiba-operated terrorism training camps in Pakistan and helped Lashker-e-Toiba members and others plan and execute the attacks in Denmark against the newspaper which published cartoons depicting the Prophet Mohammed, which Muslims found offensive, as well as the violent attack in Mumbai, in about 170 people died.

At the same time Headley was taken into custody, U.S. investigators discovered that 20 Somali immigrants, who were reported missing from a mosque in Minnesota, had joined the Islamist insurgent group, al Shabaab, and were engaged in fighting Somalia's U.S.-backed government.

And there is the case of Najibullah Zazi, a 24-year-old resident of Denver, who made a trip to Peshawar, Pakistan, in 2008 for the stated purpose of visiting his wife only to show up at an al Qaeda training camp where he received instruction in making and detonating explosives. In September, Zazi was collared by federal officials as he made his way to New York City to carry out attacks with the same back-pack bombs that were used to blow up a train station in Madrid and several subway stations in London.

Where are the Muslim men from Islamberg?

The answer comes from a heavy-set woman in a long black burka who stops to check her mail box. “The men – all gone,” she says in halting English. “All – in Pakistan.”

Islamberg was established in 1980 by Sheikh Mubarak Ali Gilani, a Pakistani cleric who served as the imam of the Yasin Masjid in Brooklyn. A quack practitioner of something called “Koranic psychiatry,” Sheikh Gilani presented himself to the Brooklyn congregation as "the sixth Sultan ul Faqr,” with a lineage that dates back to the prophet Mohammed. He claimed to have supernatural powers that came from his regular reception of visits by jinn and “non-human beings.”

Sporting ammunition belts, Gilani called upon members of a Black Muslim street gang known as Dar al-Islam (DAR) to take part in the holy war against the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. Hundreds answered the call and headed off to training camps in Pakistan, which had been established by Osama bin Laden, and other members of the mujahadeen.

Under Gilani’s direction, the DAR transformed into Jamaat ul-Fuqra (“the community of the impoverished”) and continued its prison ministry under Muslims of the Americas, a new, non-profit corporation. The sheikh soon came to realize that it would be financially advantageous to train new recruits for the holy war on American soil rather than shelling out the freight of sending them to Lahore and Peshawar. He purchased a 70-acre parcel of land near Green Haven, set up a firing range and an obstacle course, purchased a slew of old single-wide trailers and created a paramilitary compound called Islamberg.

When released from the federal prison, former convicts now received not only the customary $10 and a suit of clothes but also a one-way ticket to Gilani’s compound.

What took place at Islamberg and the International Quranic Open University?

The answers came from Sheikh Gilani in his recruitment videos: “We give [students] specialized training in guerilla warfare. We are at present establishing training camps. You can easily reach us at Open Quranic offices in upstate New York or in Canada or in South Carolina or in Pakistan.”

Similarly, in a handbook, published by the university, Gilani wrote that the foremost duty of all students is to wage war against “the oppressors of Muslims.” The students are expected to sign an oath that reads: “I shall always hear and obey, and whenever given the command, I shall readily fight for Allah’s sake.”

Now that the recruits at Islamberg have been trained in the basics of guerilla warfare, they have been deployed to Pakistan for advanced courses in explosives and weapons of mass destruction.

They will be returning home soon.

http://www.jihadwatch.org/

Monday, December 28, 2009

An American

Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag... We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language.. And we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.'
Theodore Roosevelt 1907

Monday, November 23, 2009

The Warrior Song - It Speaks For Itself

I was given the link to this video by my friend MG, a big thanks to him for passing this on! It is well worth the watch!
I want to take a second to say thank you to all our military men and women past and present for the huge sacrifice they have made for this country, and even though we have a current administration who cares nothing for them and their safety, I for one am proud to fly the American Flag in my front yard 365 days a year to show my gratitude to those who have fought and died to protect it. We shall not be overcome by this corrupt administration and the corrupt politicians who are destroying this country in the name of power and greed. We shall prevail, we are the people of America who's fighting spirit will rise up against those who feel the need to destroy it. God Bless America, God Bless our military men and women and may he give us the strength and the fortitude to stand strong against an enemy that has risen up from within!

Friday, October 23, 2009

Progressivism - Socialism - Communism - Obama

Lets get technical here for a moment folks....this mess we are in right now really all started with Roosevelt, a republican, Taft also a republican, and then Wilson, a democrat, all whom were big time progressives trying hard to nationalize our country. Unfortunatly, since then, people have continually allowed the government to grow bigger and bigger, looking for more and more handouts, more entitlements, more freebies and it has continued to move in that direction with nobody doing what needs to be done to stop it.
We then move through time initiating the Federal Reserve Act, Federal Trade Commission, Clayton Antitrust Act, Federal Farm Loan Act and America's very first federal progressive income tax in the Revenue Act of 1913. That was only to affect the top 1%, and only for a short time, but it quickly worked its way through the rest of the American public and never went away. Today Americans are paying in excess of 55% in tax, and they want more! Roosevelt attempted to move the Republican party in the direction of Progressivism with trust busting and increased regulation on businesses. Wilson also wanted internationalism which called for the U.S. to enter the world arena to fight for democracy, but it never materialized, until now however as we look at a coming One World Order. We now skip forward to modern day, dealing with the likes of the family business of politics including the Bush's, and the Clinton's, all pushing progressive agendas nipping at our freedoms one bill at a time, little by little, and now we have a man called Obama, who actually has people lining up in the streets on rumors of free money, who has people saying, I won't have to pay for my gas, I won't have to pay for my home, I will get everything for free because of Obama...we love Obama, Obama, Obama.....how utterly stupid can you get! We are now faced with a president who has brought himself to a new level of stupid! Combining all the previous presidents back to Roosevelt, Obama has outspent them all, and it only took 9 months!! Now he wants more money for bailouts and socialized health care which will skyrocket the national debt that will literally sink this country! We are in a financial nightmare and now this administration wants to spend more money?? What are they thinking? What dark part of their anatomy do they all have their heads shoved up?? The current administration has communists working in the white house as Czars. He also has the likes of Anita Dunn working in his administration who claims that Mao Tse Tung, a dictator who murdered more than 70 million of his own people, is her favorite political philosopher, he's her idol, she looks up to him. Really?? Do you think for one second that Obama is not doing everything in his power to grab power?? He's now attacking your religious freedom, your right to bear arms, and is trying desperately to stifle free speech!! This is not the going's on of an honest political figure, this is the going's on of a wanna be dictator in full forward motion! I have a firm belief that at the very least, 95% of the politicians in this country are dirty, dishonest, self serving, power hungry crooks, no matter what their party affiliations and it is time to clear them out and put good honest people in office who will do the right thing I feel that we should never vote for anyone a second term! I also believe that anyone living in this country that thinks that socialism is the route to go, they need to leave the country and live in Cuba, Venezuela, or Iraq for 5 years, and then I would love to hear what tune they would be singing. Black Panthers leader Eldridge Cleaver fled this country and returned after a few years saying he would rather be in an American jail, than to continue to live in a country that is controlled by a dictator. We right now have a man who wants to be dictator more than anything else in this world sitting in the oval office! We are now faced with a situation where everyone is going to have to come together to fix the mess we are in. This is not an issue about color, race, religious beliefs or political sides, this is about Americans coming together to take back our country and getting back to the way our founding fathers intended. I'm sure that there are plenty of people out there who would rather sit in their own little corners and wait for the day when they can raise their hand to the fuhrer and shout Sieg Heil, 50% of the German population did exactly that. That however is not my choice, and I refuse to sit back and allow it to happen! How about you????

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Couric Interviews Glenn Beck

Couric tried to trip Glenn up but ulitmatly got "stuck on stupid" and she did not have answers for Becks questions. I felt like Glenn did an excellent job being interviewed by one of the most liberal morons in the news media. This is a bit long but it was worth the watch!

Sunday, October 11, 2009

House Resolution 615

I have done this….and I urge everyone receiving this to do the same and then pass it on!!
THIS IS QUICK AND EASY
On Tuesday, the Senate health committee voted 12-11 in favor of a two-page amendment, courtesy of Tom Coburn which would require all Members of Congress and their staff members to enroll in any new government-run health plan. Congressman John Fleming (Louisiana physician) has proposed an amendment that would require Congressmen and Senators to take the same health care plan that they would have for us. (Under the proposed legislation they are exempt.) If it is good for all of us, then it must be for them also! Congressman Fleming is encouraging people to go to his Website and sign his petition.
The process is very simple. Go to: http://fleming.house.gov/index.html .
Please urge as many people as you can to do the same!
If Congress is going to force a "health care plan" on us the American citizens, they should have to accept exactly the same level of health care for themselves and their families....nothing more, nothing any different!!

Friday, October 9, 2009

Obama's Peace Prize

Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize on Friday because the judges found his promise of disarmament and diplomacy too good to ignore. He got this on a promise??? It is obvious to me that the socialist left is fully in charge of the award and not following the direction or rules of its original founder.
From Yassir Arafat to Barack Obama, in my opinion a bunch of frauds, fakers, murderers, thieves, and no-accounts stretching back over just the past 20 plus years. The Nobel Peace Prize has become a joke!
Obama has done NOTHING! Oh he has created bigger long term problems for the American people, adding over 4 trillion dollars to our deficit in just 9 short months, and he is looking to add to that figure even with the public out cry from angry citizens....so is that the diplomacy that caused them to give him a Nobel Peace Prize???
What he is creating here folks is NOT peace, and believe me when I say, I strongly believe it is time for everyone to get their houses in order, food storage needs to be updated, water storage needs to be updated, protection and supplies need to be updated. People in Germany fell easily as they had no provisions to take care of themselves, and people who are hungry, cold, thirsty and have no means of protection can be coerced into doing whatever the government wants ....and Hitler not only knew that......he counted on it!

Let me give you a quick statement made by Benjamin Franklin:
The very fame of our strength and readiness would be a means of discouraging our enemies for tis a wise and true saying that "one sword often keeps another in the scabbard." The way to secure peace is to be prepared for war. They that are on their guard, and appear ready to receive their adversaries, are in much less danger of being attacked than the supine, secure and negligent.

America used to be a force no one wanted to recon with, and then along come the likes of the Clintons, Reids, Pelosis, and Obamas just to name a few, who have destroyed our military power and put us in a position where we have been attacked on numerous occasions because our preparedness for war against any nation has been destroyed buy those who could care less about America and her freedom, just so long as they gain power and money in the process. We used to deem that as treason in this country, and those who would put America in eminent danger would have been shot. Today, America is a joke in the eyes of the world, we are no longer feared, we are laughed at and considered to be a country of idiots and fools. Frankly, I don't appreciate being looked upon this way, I know too many people who have lost loved ones who fought to keep this nation great, and I am appalled that there are those who would sell the soul of America down the drain for a few messily pieces of silver. These are the same people who want your guns.....because they know that once they have your guns, they have it all! Again.....They that are on their guard and ready, are much less likely to be attacked!

Stand up America, stand up and fight back against those who have taken us for granted. The time has come, it's now or never, the choice is up to us....and I for one will not go quietly!

Monday, October 5, 2009

Oklahoma, A State That Gets It

These new laws in the state of Oklahoma are true.
Oklahoma House bill 1330 authorized a monument resembling the Ten Commandments to be placed in the State Capitol Park in Oklahoma City. The Oklahoma House passed a final version of the bill by a vote of 83-2, on April 23, 2009. The Oklahoma Senate had passed it on a vote of 37-9. Click for Pyro Daily Times article.

On April 23, 2009, House Bill 2245 passed in the Oklahoma Senate with a vote of 43 to 0. The Oklahoma Criminal Illegal Alien Rapid Repatriation Act of 2009 "would allow the Oklahoma Department of Corrections to immediately send inmates who are in the country illegally to Immigration and Customs Enforcement for deportation." Click for KTUL article.

State Bill 1102 would require that illegal aliens and criminals convicted of a host of misdemeanor crimes submit themselves to DNA sample collection from law enforcement and data to be entered into a federal database. Named after a University of Oklahoma ballet student raped and killed in 1996, the bill was approved April 20, 2009. Click for article.

Oklahoma's House Concurrent Resolution 1028 will give the state sovereignty. The resolution’s author, state Rep. Charles Key, R-Oklahoma City, told reporters, "The point of the resolution is to tell federal lawmakers and the president to stick to their jobs as outlined in the U.S. Constitution and quit handing out federal money to failing companies." There are several other states sovereignty movements in the nation including Texas, California and Alaska. Click for Oklahoman news article.

House Bill 1025 was passed by the Oklahoma house by a vote 70-8 which would make it a misdemeanor for employers to inquire if job applicants own a gun according to May 13,2009. HB 1025 is on its way to the Senate for a vote. Click for Oklahoman news article.

Saturday, October 3, 2009

Friday, October 2, 2009

Pay Attention

I felt this video was important enough to post here on my blog. It is not political, it is about paying attention, something that could save your life or the life of someone else! Please watch this and pass it on to everyone you know!! Oh and one last thing....stay off your cell phone while you are driving, especially texting....you are pointing a loaded gun at someone and you will eventually end up pulling the trigger!!

Up On My Soapbox.....Again!!

So, I turn on the computer again today and the death toll in Indonesia from the earthquakes is at 715 and the toll is expected to rise to 1100. The first day the numbers started small, around 38 dead, but by late afternoon the media was in a massive death frenzy claiming that the death toll had reached over 100, but yet the death toll at that time from other news sources said that less than 75 people had lost their lives. Yesterday the death toll was so up and down it looked like a stock market report starting with 500 dead then dropping into the 300's and hitting end of the day totals of 777 by end of day, depending on which news source you were looking at. Now today, the 715 number is quite a bit below yesterdays ending 777 number. Sensationalism is something the news media is notorious for, in all areas of reporting. In this situation it is like a death lottery....they can't wait to see the numbers pile up! The higher the numbers the better ratings for the news media! For me, one lost life was too many, and frankly I am more interested in hearing that the survivors are being removed from the debris, families are being reunited, people are coming in to help with the clean up, and the family dog was found safe. When it's all over and the numbers are clear and concise, then a responsible reporter would sit down and write a heart felt story that would shed light on the events and the number of people who lost their lives in the tragedy.....but hell, I guess that wouldn't sell newspapers or get people to watch the news or read their newspapers!! Blood and gore, death and destruction, hours and days of constant coverage of pain and suffering plastered on the television for millions of people who have nothing better to do than sit with a bag of chips and a chicken leg in their hands drooling in anticipation of sensational numbers in the death toll and the suffering of others. Don't get me wrong....I am interested in what is happening to people who are in a bad situation, but I only need to get an update, not days and days of repetitive inaccurate dribble that envelops entire channels and newspapers and sensationalizes the pain and suffering of people just like you and me! If something happened to my family, I sure as hell wouldn't want the news media showing up in my face making a bad situation worse....somebody would get their lights put out!
Responsibility is something that for the most part no longer exists with reporters or news media outlets. We are fortunate enough to have some who are willing to go against the grain of the drive by media and provide us with responsible reporting, responsible news, responsible attitudes, and although their number are few, their rise to the top is unfolding. People are sick of being lied to, patronized and given false information and are now turning the liberal media off and finding alternatives to getting the real news and actual facts! To those who are providing our country with honesty and integrity in news reporting and broadcasting I say well done, it's about time! Oh, and for those of you living in places like San Francisco, you will need to have satellite or cable, it's your only hope!!

Thursday, October 1, 2009

Let Me Get This Straight...

So, let me get this straight....

We are working to pass a health care plan that was written by a committee whose head says he doesn't understand it.
May be passed by a Congress that hasn't read it, but exempts themselves from it.
Would be signed by a president that also hasn't read it and who frankly doesn't have a clue. Administered by a treasury chief who didn't pay his taxes.
Overseen by a surgeon general who is obese.
Financed by a country that's nearly broke.

So, what possibly could go wrong?

Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Acorn Video You Have Got To See!

Clearing the Smoke on Obama’s Eligibility: An Intelligence Investigator’s June 10 Report

This is long but very very interesting...you will want to read this, it explains allot of what has been going on with obama and his birth certificate. I saw yesterday that the courts have finally agreed that they need to hear the case.....all I can say is IT"S ABOUT TIME!! If the courts get involved then the U.S. Attorney General will need to get involved and maybe something will get done!! Here is the report:

Editors Note: In December ‘08 a retired CIA officer commissioned an investigator to look into the Barack Obama birth certificate and eligibility issue. On July 21, 2009 westernjournalism.com obtained a copy of the investigator’s report. Here is an unedited version of the report.
June 10, 2009 Report, updated July 18, 2009
The Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii
I think that I now understand the legal background to the question of where Obama was born.
Let’s begin with the statement that Dr. Chiyome Fukino, the Director of the Hawaii Department of Health released on October 31, 2008. The television and print media used this statement as a reason to prevent and treat with contempt any investigation into whether Barack Obama was not born in Hawaii. But the language of the statement was so carefully hedged and guarded that it should have had the opposite effect.
“There have been numerous requests for Sen. Barack Hussein Obama’s official birth certificate. State law (Hawai‘i Revised Statutes §338-18) prohibits the release of a certified birth certificate to persons who do not have a tangible interest in the vital record. Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.”
It is understandable that after such an apparently definitive statement most news outlets, whether conservative or liberal, would accept this as sufficient grounds to relegate the controversy to the status of a fringe phenomenon. Unless they happened to take the trouble to look into the “state policies and procedures” as laid down by the relevant statutes. If they had done so, they would have seen that Dr. Fukino’s press release was carefully hedged and “lawyered” and practically worthless. But the media in general should not be faulted. The statement seems to roll out with such bureaucratic certainty and final authority. I believed it to be significant until a Honolulu attorney mailed me the relevant statutes. I was so surprised that I laughed out loud.
Here is a summary of Hawaii’s “state policies and procedures” in 1961.
In the State of Hawaii, back in 1961, there were four different ways to get an “original birth certificate” on record. They varied greatly in their reliability as evidence. For convenience, I’ll call them BC1, BC2, BC3, and BC4.
BC1. If the birth was attended by a physician or mid wife, the attending medical professional was required to certify to the Department of Health the facts of the birth date, location, parents’ identities and other information. (See Section 57-8 & 9 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).
Actual long form Certificate of Live Birth similar to one Obama refuses to release
BC2. In 1961, if a person was born in Hawaii but not attended by a physician or midwife, then all that was required was that one of the parents send in a birth certificate to be filed. The birth certificate could be filed by mail. There appears to have been no requirement for the parent to actually physically appear before “the local registrar of the district.” It would have been very easy for a relative to forge an absent parent’s signature to a form and mail it in. In addition, if a claim was made that “neither parent of the newborn child whose birth is unattended as above provided is able to prepare a birth certificate, the local registrar shall secure the necessary information from any person having knowledge of the birth and prepare and file the certificate.” (Section 57-8&9) I asked the Dept of Health what they currently ask for (in 2008) to back up a parent’s claim that a child was born in Hawaii. I was told that all they required was a proof of residence in Hawaii (e.g. a driver’s license [We know from interviews with her friends on Mercer Island in Washington State that Ann Dunham had acquired a driver’s license by the summer of 1961 at the age of 17] or telephone bill) and pre-natal (statement or report that a woman was pregnant) and post-natal (statement or report that a new-born baby has been examined) certification by a physician. On further enquiry, the employee that I spoke to informed me that the pre-natal and post-natal certifications had probably not been in force in the ‘60s. Even if they had been, there is and was no requirement for a physician or midwife to witness, state or report that the baby was born in Hawaii.
BC3. In 1961, if a person was born in Hawaii but not attended by a physician or midwife, then, up to the first birthday of the child, a “Delayed Certificate” could be filed, which required that “a summary statement of the evidence submitted in support of the acceptance for delayed filing or the alteration [of a file] shall be endorsed on the certificates”, which “evidence shall be kept in a special permanent file.” The statute provided that “the probative value of a ‘delayed’ or ‘altered’ certificate shall be determined by the judicial or administrative body or official before whom the certificate is offered as evidence.” (See Section 57- 9, 18, 19 & 20 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).”
[In other words, this form of vault birth certificate, the Delayed Certificate, required no more than a statement before a government bureaucrat by one of the parents or (the law does not seem to me clear on this) one of Barack Obama’s grandparents. If the latter is true, Ann Dunham did not have to be present for this statement or even in the country.]
BC4. If a child is born in Hawaii, for whom no physician or mid wife filed a certificate of live birth, and for whom no Delayed Certificate was filed before the first birthday, then a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth could be issued upon testimony of an adult (including the subject person [i.e. the birth child as an adult]) if the Office of the Lieutenant Governor was satisfied that a person was born in Hawaii, provided that the person had attained the age of one year. (See Section 57-40 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961.) In 1955 the “secretary of the Territory” was in charge of this procedure. In 1960 it was transferred to the Office of the Lieutenant Governor (“the lieutenant governor, or his secretary, or such other person as he may designate or appoint from his office” [in 1961]).
Certification of Live Birth, released by Obama
In 1982, the vital records law was amended to create a fifth kind of “original birth certificate”. Under Act 182 H.B. NO. 3016-82, “Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that the proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.” In this way “state policies and procedures” accommodate even “children born out of State” (this is the actual language of Act 182) with an “original birth certificate on record.” So it is even possible that the birth certificate referred to by Dr Fukino is of the kind specified in Act 182. This possibility cannot be dismissed because such a certificate certainly satisfies Dr Fukino’s statement that “I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.” If this is the case, Dr Fukino would have perpetrated so unusually disgusting a deception that I find it practically incredible (and I greatly doubt that anyone could be that shameless). On the other hand, if the original birth certificate is of types 2, 3, or 4, Dr Fukino’s statement would be only somewhat less deceptive and verbally tricky. I only bring up this possibility to show how cleverly hedged and “lawyered” and basically worthless Dr Fukino’s statement is.
Sections 57-8, 9, 18, 19, 20 & 40 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act explain why Barack Obama has refused to release the original vault birth certificate. If the original certificate were the standard BC1 type of birth certificate, he would have allowed its release and brought the controversy to a quick end. But if the original certificate is of the other kinds, then Obama would have a very good reason not to release the vault birth certificate. For if he did, then the tape recording of Obama’s Kenyan grandmother asserting that she was present at his birth in Kenya becomes far more important. As does the Kenyan ambassador’s assertion that Barack Obama was born in Kenya, as well as the sealing of all government and hospital records relevant to Obama by the Kenyan government. And the fact that though there are many witnesses to Ann Dunham’s presence on Oahu from Sept 1960 to Feb 1961, there are no witnesses to her being on Oahu from March 1961 to August 1962 when she returned from Seattle and the University of Washington. No Hawaiian physicians, nurses, or midwives have come forward with any recollection of Barack Obama’s birth.
The fact that Obama refuses to release the vault birth certificate that would instantly clear up this matter almost certainly indicates that the vault birth certificate is probably a BC2 or possibly a BC3.
It is almost certainly a BC 3 or even a BC 4 if the “Certification of Live Birth” posted on the Daily Kos blog and the fightthesmears.com website by the Obama campaign is a forgery. Ron Polarik has made what several experts claim to be a cogent case that it is a forgery. There have been a couple of attempts to refute his argument and Polarik has replied to the most extensive of them. I do not claim expertise in this area, but I think it would be best for journalists and politicians to familiarize themselves with the arguments on both sides before they casually dismiss Polarik’s position without taking the trouble to understand it.
Here are 2 of Polarik’s websites: http://bogusbirthcertificate.blogspot.com/
http://bogusbithcertificate.blogspot.com/
Because the disputants know far more about this subject than I do, I am an agnostic about Polarik’s argument. However, the likelihood that this computer-generated “Certification of Live Birth” was forged, is, I believe, increased by the fact that it has been pretty clearly established that Obama “either didn’t register for the draft or did so belatedly and fraudulently. The documents indicate that it’s one or the other.” http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/004431print.html The forgery of Obama’s selective service registration was necessary, because according to Federal law, “A man must be registered to be eligible for jobs in the Executive Branch of the Federal government and the U.S. Postal Service. This applies only to men born after December 31, 1959.” http://usmilitary.about.com/cs/wars/a/draft2.htm)
It is also very strange that Dr Fukino’s statement in no way attested to (or even addressed the issue of) the authenticity of the “Certification of Live Birth” (and the information that appears on it) that the Daily Kos blog and the Obama campaign posted on line. Dr Fukino merely stated that “I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.”
If there is no hospital or physician record in the vault birth certificate, then he wasn’t born in a hospital in Hawaii. And a home birth or non-hospital birth can then be ruled out for the following reason.
When someone has a home birth or is not born in a hospital, this becomes a part of his family’s lore and is now and again spoken of by his parents. He and his siblings grow up knowing that he was born at home or his uncle’s house, etc. The fact that someone in the campaign told a Washington Post reporter that he was born in Kapioliani hospital and his sister said he was born at Queens hospital indicates that there was not and is not any Obama/Dunham family memory of a home birth or non-hospital birth in Hawaii.
And if there is no hospital record in the original vault birth certificate, then he was not born in a hospital in Hawaii.
Instead of the birth certificate on file at the Hawaii Dept of Health, the Obama campaign posted on the Daily Kos blog and the Fightthesmears website a “Certification of Live Birth”. The Certification of Live Birth is not a copy of the original birth certificate. It is a computer-generated document that the state of Hawaii issues on request to indicate that a birth certificate of some type is “on record in accordance with state policies and procedures”. And there is the problem. Given the statutes in force in 1961, the Certification of Live Birth proves nothing unless we know what is on the original birth certificate. There are several legal areas (involving ethnic quotas and subsidy) for which the state of Hawaii up until June 2009 did not accept its computer-generated Certification of Live Birth as sufficient proof of birth in Hawaii or parentage. Why should the citizens of the United States be content with lower standards for ascertaining the qualifications of their President?
If you combine an awareness of what the Certification of Live Birth posted on the internet really is with 1) a knowledge of the relevant statutes in 1961 and 2) Obama’s stubborn refusal to permit the release of the real birth certificate and his determination to fight any legal actions that would compel him to do so, it becomes clear that there is no logical explanation for Obama’s refusal without taking into consideration the relevant statutes. Then his behavior becomes clear. The Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii is the missing piece of the puzzle.
Most people think of a birth certificate as a statement by a hospital or midwife with a footprint, etc. (That may be why some main-stream journalists have straight out lied about this. Jonathan Alter, senior editor at Newsweek magazine, for example, told Keith Olbermann on MSNBC on Feb 20, 2009 that “They [the Republicans] are a party that is out of ideas so they have to resort to these lies about the fact that he’s not a citizen. This came up during the campaign, Keith. The Obama campaign actually posted his birth certificate from a Hawaii hospital online.” But it is Alter who resorted to lying to the American people on television. “The Obama campaign” never “actually posted his birth certificate from a Hawaii hospital online.” On July 17, 2009 CNN’s Kitty Pilgrim lied when she stated that the Obama campaign had produced “the original birth certificate” on the internet and that FactCheck.org had examined the original birth certificate; whether it was forged or not, the Certification of Live Birth that was posted by the campaign and FactCheck.org is not, and by definition, cannot be the original birth certificate or a copy of the original birth certificate. There were no computer generated Certifications of Live Birth in 1961, the year Obama was born. Obama’s original birth certificate (whether it was filed in 1961 or later) was a very different document from the Certification of Live Birth on FactCheck.org. On the FactCheck.org web site, the claim is made that “FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate.” So FactCheck.org is lying about this as well.
FactCheck.org gets its prestige from a reputation for objectivity. Why would those who run this site choose to tell so obvious a lie and so endanger the site’s reputation? The answer is in the date of the posting, August 21, 2008. It was in mid-August that questions about the Certification of Live Birth began to reach a critical mass and threaten to enter the public discourse. The mostly pro-Obama television and newspaper/magazine media had to be given an excuse and cover for their collective decision to dismiss or ignore the substantial questions about whether Obama met the qualifications for the office set forth in Article II section I of the Constitution. And those reporters and editors who were not in the tank for Obama had to be deceived. After Labor Day the swing voters would begin to pay attention to the Presidential campaign. The truth had to be killed. And with its lie about “how it examined and photographed the original birth certificate“, FactCheck.org killed it.)
Most people would not consider a mailed-in form by one of his parents (who could have been out of the country or whose signature could have been forged by a grandparent) or a sworn statement by one of his grandparents or by his mother or even a sworn statement by himself many years later to be sufficient evidence (when set next to the statements by his maternal grandmother and the Kenyan ambassador that he was born in another country). Unless the American people are shown the original birth certificate, all of these are possibilities. And if Obama refuses to allow the state of Hawaii to release the original birth certificate, it begins to look like he was not born in a Hawaii hospital or at home with the assistance of a doctor or midwife. A reasonable person would acknowledge that there are serious reasons to doubt that Barack Obama was born in the United States. This is especially true because, if Obama was born in a foreign country, his family had a compelling reason to lie about it.
In 1961 if a 17 year old American girl gave birth in a foreign country to a child whose father was not an American citizen, that child had no right to any American citizenship, let alone the “natural born” citizenship that qualifies someone for the Presidency under Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution.
In 1961, the year that Barack Obama was born, under Sec. 301 (a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, Ann Dunham could not transmit citizenship of any kind to Barack Obama.
“ 7 FAM 1133.2-2 Original Provisions and Amendments to Section 301
(CT:CON-204; 11-01-2007)
“a. Section 301 as Effective on December 24, 1952: When enacted in 1952, section 301 required a U.S. citizen married to an alien to have been physically present in the United States for ten years, including five after reaching the age of fourteen, to transmit citizenship to foreign-born children. The ten-year transmission requirement remained in effect from 12:01 a.m. EDT December 24, 1952, through midnight November 13, 1986, and still is applicable to persons born during that period.
“As originally enacted, section 301(a)(7) stated: Section 301. (a) The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth: (7) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than ten years, at least five of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States by such citizen parent may be included in computing the physical presence requirements of this paragraph.”
The Immigration and Nationality Corrections Act (Public Law 103-416) on October 25, 1994 revised this law to accommodate “a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years”.
But in 1961, if Barack Obama had been born outside of the country, the Dunham family had no way of knowing that in 1994 Congress would pass a law that would retroactively make him a citizen. At that time, the only way to get citizenship for him would be to take advantage of one of the loopholes in the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act.
People can debate the meaning of the term “natural-born citizen” as long as they like but this is clear: If, in 1961, 17 year old Ann Dunham gave birth to a child on foreign soil whose father was not an American citizen, then the Immigration and Nationality Act at that time denied Barack Obama any right to American citizenship of any kind. Therefore if at the time of his birth Obama was ineligible for American citizenship of any kind, then he cannot be a “natural-born citizen”. This is true even if the Immigration and Nationality Act was changed 33 years after he was born. Even if the law was retroactively changed to grant citizenship (but not “natural-born” citizenship) to some of those who had at birth been denied it. If a person is not at the time of his birth an American citizen, he cannot be a natural-born citizen. Therefore, that person is ineligible under Article II, Section1 for the Office of President of the United States.
It is only by examining the 18th century usage and definition of a term that we can ascertain its meaning in the Constitution. In the 18th century, and at the time of the framing and ratification of the Constitution by the states, the term “natural-born” subject or citizen was always used or defined in such a way as to exclude the child of a British or American girl or woman when that child was born in a foreign country and that child’s father was a foreign citizen. No 18th century jurist would have thought the term “natural-born” citizen or subject could have been extended to the child of a British or American girl or woman when that child was born in a foreign country and that child’s father was a foreign citizen.
Here is Blackstone’s classic exposition in 1765 of the legal meaning of the term from the Commentaries on the Laws of England.
William Blackstone, Commentaries 1:354, 357–58, 361–62 1765
“Natural-born subjects are such as are born within the dominions of the crown of England, that is, within the ligeance, or as it is generally called, the allegiance of the king; and aliens, such as are born out of it.. . .
“When I say, that an alien is one who is born out of the king’s dominions, or allegiance, this also must be understood with some restrictions. The common law indeed stood absolutely so; with only a very few exceptions: so that a particular act of parliament became necessary after the restoration, for the naturalization of children of his majesty’s English subjects, born in foreign countries during the late troubles. And this maxim of the law proceeded upon a general principle, that every man owes natural allegiance where he is born, and cannot owe two such allegiances, or serve two masters, at once. Yet the children of the king’s embassadors born abroad were always held to be natural subjects: for as the father, though in a foreign country, owes not even a local allegiance to the prince to whom he is sent; so, with regard to the son also, he was held (by a kind of postliminium) to be born under the king of England’s allegiance, represented by his father, the embassador. To encourage also foreign commerce, it was enacted by statute 25 Edw. III. st. 2. that all children born abroad, provided both their parents were at the time of the birth in allegiance to the king,…might inherit as if born in England: and accordingly it hath been so adjudged in behalf of merchants. But by several more modern statutes these restrictions are still farther taken off: so that all children, born out of the king’s ligeance, whose fathers were natural-born subjects, are now natural-born subjects themselves, to all intents and purposes, without any exception; unless their said fathers were attainted, or banished beyond sea, for high treason; or were then in the service of a prince at enmity with Great Britain.” [The italics are Blackstone's]
The irresponsible confirmation in the Senate of the irresponsible tallying of votes in the Electoral College does not supersede the clear meaning of Article II, Section 1. If it is allowed to stand, disregard of the Constitution by all branches of the government would be openly established. To all who believe that the Constitution is the government’s basic law, that the Constitution is the only instrument that gives the enactments of Congress and the commands of the Executive validity, it will be clear that the rule of law in the United States is a fiction.
Journalists and politicians complain that we must avoid a Constitutional crisis, but there already is a Constitutional crisis. It has been caused by Obama’s refusal to take the simple step to clear the matter up. The power of the Executive branch has been compromised. Its right to collect taxes and sign Congressional enactments into law, in fact all of its powers, have become problematic. Since their validity under Section I is now doubtful, they depend on the illegal exercise of force. Since officers of the American military take their oath on commissioning to the Constitution and not the President, their obedience to the Commander-in-Chief has lapsed and, if they challenge or resist his authority, any courts-martial will also be an illegal exercise of force. The only way out of the present Constitutional crisis is for Obama to do as McCain did when he was confronted by far less pressing doubts about the circumstances of his birth. He must disclose his vault birth certificate. Since the document has been so suspiciously withheld for so long, it should be subjected to rigorous forensic tests. Then whatever is on it should be judicially assessed together with the claims that have been made that Barack Obama was born on foreign soil.
It should be added that “Obama’s top terrorism and intelligence adviser, John O. Brennan, heads a firm that was cited in March for breaching sensitive files in the State Department’s passport office, according to a State Department Inspector General’s report released this past July.
“The security breach, first reported by the Washington Times and later confirmed by State Department spokesman Sean McCormack, involved a contract employee of Brennan’s firm, The Analysis Corp., which has earned millions of dollars providing intelligence-related consulting services to federal agencies and private companies.
“During a State Department briefing on March 21, 2008, McCormack confirmed that the contractor had accessed the passport files of presidential candidates Barack Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, and John McCain, and that the inspector general had launched an investigation.
“Sources who tracked the investigation tell Newsmax that the main target of the breach was the Obama passport file, and that the contractor accessed the file in order to ‘cauterize’ the records of potentially embarrassing information.
“ ‘They looked at the McCain and Clinton files as well to create confusion,’ one knowledgeable source told Newsmax. ‘But this was basically an attempt to cauterize the Obama file.’
“At the time of the breach, Brennan was working as an unpaid adviser to the Obama campaign.
” ‘This individual’s actions were taken without the knowledge or direction of anyone at The Analysis Corp. and are wholly inconsistent with our professional and ethical standards,’ Brennan’s company said in a statement sent to reporters after the passport breach was made public.
“The passport files include ‘personally identifiable information such as the applicant’s name, gender, social security number, date and place of birth, and passport number,’ according to the inspector general report.
“The files may contain additional information including ‘original copies of the associated documents,’ the report added. Such documents include birth certificates, naturalization certificates, or oaths of allegiance for U.S.-born persons who adopted the citizenship of a foreign country as minors.”
“The State Department Office of Inspector General (OIG) issued a 104-page report on the breach last July. Although it is stamped ‘Sensitive but Unclassified,’ the report was heavily redacted in the version released to the public, with page after page blacked out entirely.”
http://www.newsmax.com/timmerman/brennan_passport_breach/2009/01/12/170430.html
The following may be relevant:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/apr/19/key-witness-in-passport-fraud-case-fatally-shot/
Key witness in passport fraud case fatally shot
Saturday, April 19, 2008
“A key witness in a federal probe into passport information stolen from the State Department was fatally shot in front of a District church, the Metropolitan Police Department said yesterday.
“Lt. Quarles Harris Jr., 24, who had been cooperating with a federal investigators, was found late Thursday night slumped dead inside a car, in front of the Judah House Praise Baptist Church in Northeast, said Cmdr. Michael Anzallo, head of the department’s Criminal Investigations Division.
“Cmdr. Anzallo said a police officer was patrolling the neighborhood when gunshots were heard, then Lt. Harris was found dead inside the vehicle, which investigators would describe only as a blue car.
“Emergency medics pronounced him dead at the scene.
“City police said they do not know whether his death was a direct result of his cooperation with federal investigators.
“We don’t have any information right now that connects his murder to that case,” Cmdr. Anzallo said.
“Police say a “shot spotter” device helped an officer locate Lt. Harris.
“A State Department spokeswoman yesterday declined to comment, saying the investigation into the passport fraud is ongoing.
“The Washington Times reported April 5 that contractors for the State Department had improperly accessed passport information for presidential candidates Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton, Barack Obama and John McCain, which resulted in a series of firings that reached into the agency’s top ranks.
“One agency employee, who was not identified in documents filed in U.S. District Court, was implicated in a credit-card fraud scheme after Lt. Harris told federal authorities he obtained “passport information from a co-conspirator who works for the U.S. Department of State.” “
There is a possibility that the breaches of the passport files associated with the “credit-card fraud scheme” were a cover for or associated with the breaches of the passport files by the employee of Brennan’s Analysis Corp. This certainly at least should be looked into.
July 11th Addendum to Report
1. Until June 2009, the reasonable doubts about where Obama was born could have quickly and finally been resolved if he had authorized the release by the Hawaiian Dept of Health of his original birth certificate or else applied for it himself and released it to the media. But as these doubts have increased and reached the point where they are no longer a “fringe” phenomenon, the Hawaiian state govt has recently taken certain steps that would create procedural and possibly legal barriers to a resolution of the controversy. Given the slipperiness that characterized the statements of Chiyome Fukino, the Dept’s Director, and Janice Okubo, the Dept’s spokesperson, to the media on this issue, it is, I think, also reasonable to regard these steps with suspicion.
A family that I am acquainted with has a child who was born in Hawaii 6 months ago. They filled out and mailed in a form to the Dept of Health, as did their doctor. In return the Dept sent them in the first week of June, 2009, the same abbreviated computer-generated form that last year on the Daily Kos and subsequently on the Obama campaign web site was called a “Certification of Live Birth”. The form that this family received this year is identical in format to the Certification of Live Birth on the Daily Kos web site with one exception: the title at the top of the form.
On June 12, 2008 the title for this abbreviated form was Certification of Live Birth. The title for the form that this family received in the first week of June 2009 is Certificate of Live Birth. I called The Dept of Health and confirmed that the title of the form had been changed. The bureaucrat that I spoke to said the change had been made “recently”, but could not or would not tell me when. Sometime between June 12, 2008 and the first week of June 2009 the Hawaiian Dept of Health changed the title of this abbreviated form from “Certification of Live Birth” to “Certificate of Live Birth“. Why?
The use of the word “Certificate” rather than “Certification” makes the form feel somewhat more like a traditional birth certificate than the “Certification of Live Birth” that the Daily Kos website and subsequently the Obama campaign posted on the Internet even though, like the “Certification“, it also lacks any information about the hospital, doctor, or midwife. There is no footprint etc. This renaming of the document will be very convenient for the Hawaiian Dept of Health in future stonewalling should any legal pressure be brought against them to produce Obama’s “Certificate of Live Birth”. Instead of producing the original “Certificate of Live Birth”, they will produce the abbreviated “Certification of Live Birth” form that the Dept of Health has now renamed a “Certificate of Live Birth” and claim that they are doing so “in accordance with state policies and procedures” in the words of the Dept’s Director, Dr. Chiyome Fukino.
But whether it is called (as it was last year) a Certification or (as it is now) a Certificate of Live Birth this abbreviated document provides none of the probative information that was or wasn’t on Barack Obama’s original Certificate of Live Birth. Unlike the Certificate of Live Birth of the time when Barack Obama was born, this new Certificate of Live Birth provides no real evidence of where a child was born or indication of where such evidence might be found. It provides no information that would demonstrate to the people of the United States whether there is convincing evidence that he was actually born here or whether a relative or two (or possibly even Barack Obama himself) just made a statement to that effect to a low level bureaucrat. (As is permitted under Section 57-40 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii.)
2. On June 7, 2009, a spokeswoman for the Hawaii Department of Health told a rather obvious lie (or engaged in a pretty transparent verbal deception) in another attempt to discourage further investigation into the issue of whether Barack Obama was born on Oahu. “The state Department of Health no longer issues copies of paper birth certificates as was done in the past”, said spokeswoman Janice Okubo. “The department only issues ‘certifications’ of live births, and that is the ‘official birth certificate’ issued by the state of Hawaii, she said. ” [Honolulu Star Bulletin] http://www.starbulletin.com/columnists/kokualine/20090606_kokua_line.html
This statement was false or deliberately very misleading. Here, from a Hawaii state document that was posted on June 10, 2009, is a description of how to apply for “the original Certificate of Live Birth” (the original birth certificate) as opposed to the Certification of Live Birth:
“In order to process your application [to prove native Hawaiian ancestry], DHHL [Department of Hawaiian Homelands] utilizes information that is found only on the original Certificate of Live Birth, which is either black or green. This is a more complete record of your birth than the Certification of Live Birth (a computer-generated printout). Submitting the original Certificate of Live Birth will save you time and money since the computer-generated Certification requires additional verification by DHHL.
“Please note that DOH [Department of Health] no longer offers same day service. If you plan on picking up your certified DOH document(s), you should allow at least 10 working days for DOH to process your request(s), OR four to six weeks if you want your certified certificate(s) mailed to you.”
http://hawaii.gov/dhhl/applicants/appforms/applyhhl
Ms. Okubo’s statement gave the false impression that Obama could not gain access to or release “the original Certificate of Live Birth”, and that it was the DOH’s policy rather than his own reluctance that was responsible for the holding back of this Certificate. This was an obvious deception. The document at the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands website indicates that at the time she made this statement it was false, and that a procedure was in place for application for “the original Certificate of Live Birth.”
Only the information on the original birth certificate, “the original Certificate of Live Birth”, can demonstrate to the people of the United States whether there is convincing evidence that he was actually born here or whether a relative or two (or possibly even Barack Obama himself) just made a statement to that effect to a low level bureaucrat.
3. On July 8, 2009 the web site World Net Daily reported that “The state, which had excluded the controversial document [the Certification of Live Birth] as proof of native Hawaiian status, has changed its policy and now makes a point of including it.”
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=103408
Here is the new statement on the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands web site [July 8, 2009]. “The Department of Hawaiian Home Lands accepts both Certificates of Live Birth [original birth certificates and the recently renamed abbreviated computer printouts] and Certifications of Live Birth [as the abbreviated computer printouts were up till recently called] because they are official government records documenting an individual’s birth… Although original birth certificates (Certificates of Live Birth) are preferred for their greater detail, the State Department of Health (DOH) no longer issues Certificates of Live Birth. When a request is made for a copy of a birth certificate, the DOH issues a Certification of Live Birth.”
http://hawaii.gov/dhhl/applicants/appforms/applyhhl
The web site theobamafile.com picked up this significant change in procedure on the Dept of Hawaiian Homelands website on June 18, 2009. http://www.theobamafile.com/_BogusPOTUS/20090608.htm#HawaiiRuleChange
Sometime between June 10, 2009 and June 18, 2009 the State of Hawaii changed its rule on what documents and data were necessary to prove Hawaiian ancestry, thereby upgrading the apparent status of the abbreviated Certification of Live Birth which it had formerly regarded as insufficiently probative. Why?
4. On June 6, Janice Okubo, the Dept of Health spokeswoman, also told the Star Bulletin that “The electronic record of the birth is what (the Health Department) now keeps on file in order to provide same-day certified copies at our help window for most requests.” There is a troubling ambiguity in this statement. A sophisticated forensic investigation would probably be able to determine whether the original paper Certificate of Live Birth was forged, altered, or authentic. But if the data from the original paper Certificates of Live Birth has been transferred to an electronic record and then the original documents were discarded, part of the data could easily have been changed in the transfer or subsequently altered.
Why did the Hawaiian Dept of Health wait until June 6, 2009 to announce to the world that the original paper Certificates of Live Birth had been destroyed (presumably in 2001)? Shouldn’t this have been part of Dr Fukino’s statement on October 31, 2008 (right before the November election), a statement which deceptively implied the contrary:
“Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.”
We know from a document posted on June 10, 2009 on the Department of Hawaiian Homelands website that, up until very recently, either the original paper Certificates of Live Birth or (as is now implied) scanned images of those paper certificates were maintained by the Dept of Health, and copies of them were provided to confirm claims of Hawaiian ancestry. But if in June 2009 the Department of Hawaiian Homelands has decided that it will no longer require the original Certificate of Live Birth as proof for special privileges and the Department of Health spokesman says firmly that they will no longer provide copies of these original certificates, is it possible that, in the midst of the controversy over where Barack Obama was born, the Hawaiian state govt has destroyed the original paper certificate of live birth? This seems almost incredible to me, but the authorities have been so deceptive and evasive on this issue, that it cannot be dismissed as impossible.
4. On June 6, Janice Okubo, the Dept of Health spokeswoman, also told the Star Bulletin that “The electronic record of the birth is what (the Health Department) now keeps on file in order to provide same-day certified copies at our help window for most requests.” There is a troubling ambiguity in this statement. A sophisticated forensic investigation would probably be able to determine whether the original paper Certificate of Live Birth was forged, altered, or authentic. But if the data from the original paper Certificates of Live Birth has been transferred to an electronic record and then the original documents were discarded, part of the data could easily have been changed in the transfer or subsequently altered.
Why did the Hawaiian Dept of Health wait until June 6, 2009 to announce to the world that the original paper Certificates of Live Birth had been destroyed (presumably in 2001)? Shouldn’t this have been part of Dr Fukino’s statement on October 31, 2008 (right before the November election), a statement which deceptively implied the contrary:
“Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.”
We know from a document posted on June 10, 2009 on the Department of Hawaiian Homelands website that, up until very recently, either the original paper Certificates of Live Birth or (as is now implied) scanned images of those paper certificates were maintained by the Dept of Health, and copies of them were provided to confirm claims of Hawaiian ancestry. But if in June 2009 the Department of Hawaiian Homelands has decided that it will no longer require the original Certificate of Live Birth as proof for special privileges and the Department of Health spokesman says firmly that they will no longer provide copies of these original certificates, is it possible that, in the midst of the controversy over where Barack Obama was born, the Hawaiian state govt has destroyed the original paper certificate of live birth? This seems almost incredible to me, but the authorities have been so deceptive and evasive on this issue, that it cannot be dismissed as impossible.

Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Liberal Fascism by Jonah Goldberg

This is a book that needs to be read by everyone in this country as our politicians are working ever hard to bring us into Fascism. After reading this book it will bring you to a heightened sense of what is happening to you and where your present politicians are going to take you. Frankly, if it doesn't scare the hell out of you, it is time for you to just move on, as you are part of the problem in this country! This book needs to be required reading in all High Schools across the country!

Lincoln on Wealth & Government

“You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the wealthy out of freedom. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. The Government cannot give to anybody anything that the Government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that is surely the end of any nation's future.." - Abraham Lincoln

The Case Against Barack Obama

David Freddoso exposes the real Obama, and now that he is in the White House, you can see that Mr. Freddoso was right on the mark. You should still take the time to read this book, it is a real eye opener. Learn what kind of a person people elected into the White House. He is proving that he is a major threat to our national security, is working to nationalize the banks and take us into Socialism. Even if you pick it up and only read one chapter, read chapter 10, Abortion: Barack Obama's America, it will make you sick to your stomach!!

A Tribute To My Very Special Friends

I have been blessed in my life with many, many close friends, a few of them I have listed here to date. It is said that if a man should have but one close friend in his lifetime, he is blessed, I am truely blessed and very fortunate to have so many close personal friends in my life, without whom, my life would be empty! Oh and just for your information, not all those pictured here share my political views, but they are still my friends and we treat each other as such, with respect!! I will also say that everyone of the people below work hard for what they have, they are not looking for handouts and free rides. This is what America is about, hard work and being a part of the greatest nation on earth, not looking for someone to hand them something for nothing. This is the way our Constitution was designed, and it was done so by many men who did not all have the same political views, who knew that their discussions would require frequent shifting of positions and shifting of minds, but they came together out of respect to write the greatest documnet in history.
Also note that not everyone has been added to my list as yet, but be patient, if you are my friend, you will find your way onto my page! I hope I have enough room! God bless you all, and thank you for your friendship!

Daniel Roebuck

Modern day Hollywood is not high on my list these days, but there are a few actors and actresses that I follow and support, this man is one of them, and there are others you will see below who I am proud to support and call my friends. These people are of high class and integrity, and I ask for your support of these fine people. Daniel is a first class family man who cares deeply for his wife and children. He and his wife are very real and concerned parents. They keep tabs on the kids and their upbringing, and have a genuine interest in what they do, a rarity these days. Dan is one fine actor, and I would like to encourage you to follow his work and support him and his projects. There are few people in Hollywood that could light a candle next to this wonderful longtime friend and brother of mine, and I mean that with all sincerity! Click on his picture and it will take you to his website that is full of information and photos from his many years as an actor.

Michael Gregory

I met Michael back in 2000 and I have to say is one heck of a nice guy! I consider Michael to be a great American and I am proud that I got the opportunity to become his friend and brother! I support Michael in his efforts, he is an excellent actor and I encourage you to support him as well. Michael has appeared in over 300 films, TV shows and commercials. Best remembered as the first Dr. Rick Webber from daytime’s General Hospital, he has bounced from one side of the badge to the other playing “heavies” or law enforcement personnel in such films as “Nightbreaker”, “RoboCop”, “Total Recall”, and “Eraser”. You can see him as part of the permanent exhibition at Orlando Universal Studios Jurassic Park ride and you can interact with him as part of the computerized “Talk Radio” exhibit at the “P.O.V. Diner” at the Los Angeles Museum of Tolerance. Click on Micheal and it will take you to his official website where you can hear and see voiceover demos & video clips.....check out the FedEx clip...it's great!!

Branscombe Richmond

This is another great friend and brother who spends time in Hollywood. Another excellent and caring family man who has been married as long as I have, and that is a long time! He and I will be, I think it’s 30 this year, isn't that right BR? He has a wonderful wife and a bunch of great kids and at the risk of making his head swell up, is also an excellent actor. He spends allot of his time touring different countries with his band The Renegade Posse (which is now the Renegade All Stars) among other things. I would also encourage you to follow this man and his accomplishments, and if you ever get a chance to see him in concert, go, he puts on one heck of a show!! Click on his picture to go to his website and see his accomplishments.

Mickey Jones

To not know Mickey Jones by name is understandable, but to not recognize him would be very surprising. Mickey has played hundreds of characters in films and on Television. In his early musical career he played with some of the biggest artists in the industry. Bet you didn't know he was the drummer for Kenny Rogers and the First Edition! Click on Mickey and go to his website and check out all the projects he has been involved with. Mickey is a really great guy and if I had to catagorize him, I would tell you that he is very much like his character from Tool Time! Thanks for the friendship my brother and your support!

Keith Williams

I want to introduce you to another very close friend and brother of mine, Keith Williams, who's friendship with me goes back many years. Keith and his band, The Tom Jones Experience deliver an incomparable performance with a unique talent and a voice that touches the minds and hearts of all music lovers. Keith is originally from England and has toured extensively throughout the United Kingdom and Europe. Click on his picture to go to his website and hear his music and get dates for future performances. Keith resides in the Sacramento California area for those of you who live close by, try and catch one of his gigs, you will have a wonderful experience.

Burney To Drive The #32 Dollar General In 2009

On October 10th 2008 it was announced that Burney Lamar will share the Braun Racing #32 Dollar General Toyota in 2009. The car will be shared by two drivers who are both familiar faces in the yellow and black Dollar General firesuit. Sprint Cup Series driver Brian Vickers who will return to the seat of the #32 for 17 races in 2009 will be sharing the ride with Burney Lamar who drove a Dollar General-sponsored car in the 2006 season. Burneys Uncle Buck and I were long time friends and business associates until his death in December of 2008. We all miss you Mr.C

America, it is time for a change!

It is time for the American People to wake up to the reality of what is going on with lying, taking advantage of, leading you down the path of socialism government. Our politicians are greedy self serving half witted crackpots that only care about one thing, taking your money and obtaining as much power as they can. I am amazed at how many people are so easily duped into believing that what the government is doing is in the best interest of the American people. Holy cow people, how can you be so blatently out of touch with reality. This country used to operate with people working together, even the two party sides were civil with each other and worked in everyones best interest. I sit and read all the crap that is being slung at each other today, and it makes me sick. Everyone is all fired touchy about their race, color, sexual preference, if anyone calls someone a name they instantly want to sue them. People rob, kill, rape and can't understand why they go to jail, or why the cops are so eager to watch different groups of people that make them suspicious. It is not that hard people, if you don't want to go to jail, then stop doing the things that put you in that position. If you don't like being called a name, stop acting like an idiot. Learn to get along, learn to be brothers and sisters in this world, as you will take nothing with you when you leave it cept for your knowledge, your associations and your good deeds. Everyone has taken God from this country because when people think the are oh so smart, they turn from God and think they are much smarter and know everything there is to know without him. God is the foundation of this country. You would still be sitting under the controlling thumb of England had it not been for the great men under the guiding hand of God who set in motion the escape from living under tyrannistic rule. But it seems that many of you out there want to go back to that way of life, and maybe get lucky enough to have another Hitler take over and rule this country so that you can live as a prisoner, eating rats and bugs to stay alive, and dying from horrible diseases in the process. Too many of you have become complacent in your lives and in what you do and don't care about. Well I have this to say to you. If you are not willing to fight to bring this country back to being a free nation, eliminating the overshadowing government that is taking control of everyones lives and making it harder and harder to live and get along, then you should pack your bags, move to the middle east and live in a cave for the rest of your life, because that is what it seems like you want, but those of us who are not willing to lay down and die for you or the government will not stand for it, and you can either help us or leave us, make your decission before it is too late for everyone else!! Start reading and studying, and I don't mean the newspapers. Go the library or go on the internet and study, look up your politicians records and see what they are doing to you. Stop letting them push you around!!
God Bless America, and God Help Us In The Coming Years!